Talk:3rd Regiment of Riflemen

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Requested move 18 September 2017[edit]

Requested move 19 September 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– unnecessary disambiguation Joeykai (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The relevant naming convention is WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, which seems to support the move. But then, we need to be consistent within Category:Rifle regiments of the United States Army, so I amended the original request. I'm not sure if the bot will be able to catch up, though. No such user (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - I created the four pages and and disambiguation seemed a good idea at the time. Actually, I still like the idea of disambiguating all unit names because some need it and some don't, but rules are rules.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.