Talk:624th Operations Center

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 624th Operations Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110507070242/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=15681 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=15681

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Icon wrong/old

Organizational/Unit icon is wrong/old/outdated. https://tioh.army.mil/Catalog/Heraldry.aspx?HeraldryId=13937&CategoryId=8344&grp=1&menu=Uniformed%20Services

73.60.62.192 (talk) 04:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

lineage

Maybe I was wrong. 616th took over 624th job, but unsure if was redesignation. This just says Activation ceremony. https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2002267156/ Pmsyyz (talk) 02:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely going to be difficult to figure out either way until we get a current lineage document for the 616th. Question is what the best course of action is going to be until then. – Recoil (talk) 09:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, reading this article, it reads "The activation concluded with the unfurling of the 616th OC flag and activation of the newly formed 616th OC" (emphasis mine), it does not say "redesignation" and I think "newly formed" is very important here. Therefore I think we should consider moving the article back to its previous 624th location. – Recoil (talk) 09:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this pushes it over the edge for me: The video of the activation ceremony of the 616th Operations Center also includes the inactivation ceremonies of the 624th and 625th (starting with the 624th at 33:18). I will modify the article back to where it is just about the 624th and then move it back tonight or tomorrow barring any objections. – Recoil (talk) 10:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have listed it at WP:RM/TR. – Recoil (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All sorted out now, with a new article about the 616 at 616th Operations Center. – Recoil (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]