Jump to content

Talk:ALUPEC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy

[edit]

There are several parts of this article (ALUPEC) that are controversial (please see portuguese version)

The discussion in the Portuguese version is not settled yet. Please, do not make edits if an agreement has not been reached. There is no need to bring the Portuguese discussion into the English page. Ten Islands 21:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cv_ilidio@yahoo.com:

Yesterday I inserted some corrections concerning ALUPEC. Someone erased it. As you may see details in the "discussion" of the portuguese version – this article has some mistakes concerning ALUPEC: i) until now the Government did nothing to implement the law – ALUPEC; ii) as of today yet the vast majority of Capeverdeans does not know that ALUPEC exists; iii) it is a non-sense to say that someone rejected something that he did not know; iv) the author of the article is campaigning against a Government law using Wikipedia. I hope the Wikipedia’s Administration will take note of this remark. Therefore, I shall insert the truth again: were stays “the majority rejected” or “the majority did not accepted” should stay “as of today, the majority of Creole speakers still writes as before the enactment of ALUPEC”. That is the fact that can be verified. The author shall not invent the reason in the Wikipedia, for here is not the place for fabrication…

30th July, 2007; 1734 Cape Verde's time cv_ilidio@yahoo.com


I’ve made some changes to avoid future controversy and edition wars about the number of ALUPEC users. For further information check discussion page (in Portuguese). Ten Islands 15:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ALUPEC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]