Jump to content

Talk:A Transfer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:A Transfer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • In the infobox, use "plainlist" instead of "<br/>" per the rules on the template. Done
  • Is the "|story=Gainax" parameter necessary?
  • A Transfer" → "A Transfer" Done
  • What does "7.1% rating" mean?
It means that 7.1% of Japan's televisions were tuned to Tokyo TV during the run. I took it for granted, given the percentage.

Plot

[edit]
  • The plot is 417 words, while it should be under 400 per WP:TVPLOT. Done
  • Remove the comma after "poorly for Nerv".
Removed.

Production

[edit]
  • What exactly is "a mount" within the context of the show?
Specified.

Cultural references and themes

[edit]
  • The caption on the image should describe its significance within the article.
  • Also improve the non-free use rationales of the images (see MOS:TVIMAGE for help).
Hope it helps.
  • "awkward communication. ... Evangelion" → "awkward communication [...] Evangelion"
Fixed.
  • "the sixties inspire" → "the 1960s inspired" Done
  • Wikipedia doesn't normally use phrases like "he said" so try rewording the sentence. Done
  • References should be included at the end of each quote, so recite certain sources. Done
  • "A transfer" → "A Transfer" Done

Reception

[edit]
  • Again, explain what "7.1% rating" means and/or refers to.
  • The second reference after "home video releases" is missing parts of its title. Done
  • "as it shows" → "as it showed" Done

Notes and references

[edit]
  • Change the "Notes" header to "References", add a subsection titled "Citations" and make the original "References" section into a "Bibliography" subsection (example). Done
  • Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool). Done
  • Optional, but it helps readers if you link websites within the "|website=" parameter. Done


@Some Dude From North Carolina:Tried my best.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk18:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by TeenAngels1234 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was made into a good article within 7 days of nomination and is at least 1,500 characters. It is neutral and cites sources with inline citations. I will have to assume good faith on print sources. I am more inclined to ALT1 as the original ALT doesn't seem to be eye-catching.lullabying (talk) 22:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lullabying: Thank you. Forgive me, but for some reason this template is missing from the main DYNN page. Is there a reason? It's a problem? Sorry, but it's my second nomination and I still don't quite understand the mechanism.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TeenAngels1234: After your nomination was approved, a bot moved it from the DYNN page to the "approved" page at WP:DYKNA (you should be able to see it there). There's a lot of approved hooks, but eventually a promoter will come by, double check the nomination, and move it to a DYK set so it can be scheduled to run on the Main Page. You should be all set in the meantime, just a matter of waiting. DanCherek (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thank you, of course.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]