Talk:Abraham Pietersen van Deusen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This guy is my great great great great great great great great Grandfather! --Ferbess (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is my great great great great great great great great great great grandfather --Ishmaelblues (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he got married on the Grote Houtstraat in 1629, then he may have been a Mennonite. Jane (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1629 is too early for the Mennonite church on Grote houtstraaat. They would have been married in the Grote Kerk (St. Bavo). They were definitely Dutch Reformed.Tuyvan (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abraham Pietersen van Deusen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]