Talk:Actinism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Re-stubbed[edit]

Not sure why this article was re-'stubbed'... I messaged the editor that re-applied stub label and got no response so, removing stub label again. If anyone has info they would like worked into the article just message me. Jonathan888 22:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


After researching further, externally, am I correct in reaching the conclusion that the use of "Actinic" was meant to convey - "Sensitivity to a specific wavelength (or zone) within the visible light spectrum"? If so, maybe a similar statement should be added to this article for ease of understanding. 60.240.181.62 (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Aquarium?[edit]

What exactly is an actinic light for aquariums? Is that the only definition, that it 'gives off a bluish tint'? Or does it have UV light too? Is it called actinic because it tries to cause photochemical reactions (i.e. growth) in coral? --24.46.164.83 03:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Actinic Light into Actinism Klbrain (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I propose that Actinic light be merged into this page. I think that a section on this page would be best for explaining actinic light, as opposed to having a separate article. Also, these two articles are clearly related, but neither links to the other leading to an unnecessary bifurcation in coverage of this topic. SarrCat ∑;3 00:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Sarrcat's merger proposal, it makes more sense to have a complete explanation on one page. I came to Actinism through a link in a reference to Actinic Light in the aquaculture section of Colour Temperature:- Applications. In this situation the Actinic Light stub made very little sense... until I noticed this merger proposal link... and ventured to the Actinism page. 60.240.181.62 (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Merge:agree. Klbrain (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Actinism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)