Talk:Adam Kadmon

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adam Kadmon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kabbalah (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.KabbalahWikipedia:WikiProject KabbalahTemplate:WikiProject KabbalahKabbalah articles

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

This Article's Content

...was almost wholly lifted from http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/761-adam-kadmon . I realize that the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia is public domain and I'm not saying that there's anything wrong here buuuuut hey, it looks like some of the interesting content has been cut, possibly due to sectarian bias?

also, it'd be nice to see an article on an esoteric jewish subject that actually had more than a little hebrew in it. i know, i know, DO IT YOURSELF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.31.211.181 (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review section on Pauline view

It looks like the claim that the earthly Adam appeared first but was not created first, is based on the above quoted Jewish encyclopedia falsely claiming that these are Pauline dogmatics. Paul does not state this in Chronicles 15:45-50 but rather that the last Adam is the spiritual Adam—Jesus Christ. The reference to his “spiritual body” is an allusion to his imperishable, post-resurrection body, animated by the third person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit. The section then goes on to quote from the Midrash and Gonsticism which is unrelated to Pauline eschatology and should be removed/reworked.12:27, 7 February 2021

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Kadmon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031204183610/http://www.inner.org:80/worlds/1adamkad.htm to http://www.inner.org/worlds/1adamkad.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Genesis quote?

The article contains the text "The remarkable contradiction between the two above-quoted passages of Genesis", but I don't see two quotations from Genesis above this text. The quote should be added back. Bayle Shanks (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are mentioned in the previous paragraph. I'll fix it. Editor2020 (talk) 22:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kabbalism

The term Kabbalism is generally used pejoratively by critics. I would suggest using a more neutral term that doesn't take sides. --76.168.1.85 (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]