Talk:Adipurush/Archive 1

Archive 1

Orphaned references in Adipurush

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Adipurush's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "budget":

• From List of most expensive non-English-language films: "Investments covered, Baahubali 2 is a gold mine even before release: Experts". Hindustan Times. 8 April 2017. Retrieved 5 May 2017.
• From Ajay Devgn FFilms: "'Bol Bachchan' crosses Rs 50 crore mark". ibnlive.in. 10 July 2012. Archived from the original on 12 July 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2022

Changing the grammatical error of naming hindu diety Rama as raghav 110.235.237.159 (talk) 13:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: according to the Variety article, the name "Raghav" was intentionally chosen in place of Rama. Madeline (part of me) 15:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

genre

Hindu Mythological Periodic War Drama 2401:4900:38CA:7890:4B9C:2124:B7DD:CACF (talk) 04:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Writers of ADIPURUSH

Story and Screenplay by OM RAUT Dialogues MANOJ MUNTASHR Music by AJAY-ATUL Background Score SANCHIT BALHARA and ANKIT BALHARA 122.180.16.97 (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Writers of ADIPURUSH

Story by OM RAUT 122.180.16.97 (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2022

Change main pic to the latest poster released by makers of Adipurush 2409:4041:2E11:91C2:0:0:8949:3F06 (talk) 07:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

 Already done Blazin777 (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

|ans Vishnubhandari (talk) 12:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Release date

The film Adipurush is to be released on 16 June 2023 on Worldwide 20000+ screens which is going to be the biggest release ever in the history of Indian Cinema. Which will be released in 3D and imax, Read more 2402:3A80:1AAF:15F6:8531:8EC1:9CDF:8299 (talk) 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Budget

Add the proper budget 61.3.160.198 (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Based on

This film is not completely following the Ramayana; it is taking elements from the Ramcharitmanas with modern modifications. It should be mentioned that this film is based on Ramcharitmanas by Tulsidas and Ramayana by Valmiki. Sandip 20:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2023

"7,000 years ago, Ayodhya's prince Raghava and his brother Lakshmana travel to the island of Lanka with the help of Bajrang's army with an aim to rescue Raghava's wife Janaki, who had been abducted by Lankesh, the demon king of Lanka."

In above paragrapgh Lankesh was mentioned as demon king? He is not. He is the Shiva Bakthar and not a demon.

Kindly edit it.

Change

"7,000 years ago, Ayodhya's prince Raghava and his brother Lakshmana travel to the island of Lanka with the help of Bajrang's army with an aim to rescue Raghava's wife Janaki, who had been abducted by Lankesh, the demon king of Lanka."

to

"7,000 years ago, Ayodhya's prince Raghava and his brother Lakshmana travel to the island of Lanka with the help of Bajrang's army with an aim to rescue Raghava's wife Janaki, who had been abducted by Lankesh, the king of Lanka." Hbkrajan (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: I've included some references below where Ravana is described as a demon king.

1, 2, 3, 4 DreamRimmer (talk) 10:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023

223.233.123.130 (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Kanishk Mahawar is known for the singer in Adipurush.

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm14738702/ 223.233.123.130 (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Heart ^(talk) 13:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023 (2)

Change budget from ₹500 crores to ₹700 crores Someoneanonymous404 (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023 (3)

Change budget from ₹500 crores to ₹700 crores

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_Indian_films 2402:8100:3861:BDF6:1:2:AFF6:A119 (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Since Wikipedia articles aren't considered reliable sources, the same claim in the article you provided is unsourced and could be removed at any time. DreamRimmer (talk) 16:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2023

change box office est. figure of 100 crores. The reference used is fake and the figure is opinion based and highly exaggerated. Avisek75 (talk) 20:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

 Note: I've replaced that unreliable source with a more reliable one. See WP:ICTFSOURCES. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 00:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2023 (2)

Please write the correct collection. does it even crossed 50 cr?🤣🤣 2404:7C00:41:452D:F5B4:1602:72BE:8D3A (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2023

Goddess Sita was born in Sitamarhi, according to both the page of Sita and Sitamarhi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sita). It would be disingenuous only to mention Janakpur as the birthplace of Sita. It's also wrong to say Mithila is in Nepal if most of the region is in India. Yantraman (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 02:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2023

Please change - > Adipurush (transl. First man)[a] is a 2023 Indian mythological action film based on the Hindu epic Ramayana

To -> Adipurush (transl. First man)[a] is a 2023 Indian film based on the Hindu epic Ramayana

Please Remove Mythology from this sentence as Ramayana and Ram is not considered a myth but a history and part of Indian culture. Ramayana is not a fantasy. Please do not use these words and hurt religious sentiments of Hindus Rtgt (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. we need source for is not considered a myth but a history and part of Indian culture -Lemonaka‎ 20:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023

Change budget 500cr to 700cr 203.194.99.201 (talk) 11:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the sources, the film's budget is 500 crores. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 13:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2023

Ramayana is not a mythological film, its our indian history. Please change it. 5.195.232.223 (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See Ramayana — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

@DaxServer where in that article it mentions Ramayana is a myth? Rtgt (talk) 18:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

@DaxServer Where in Ramayana it says its a myth?

''The Last Temptation of Christ'' (film) Does it say this is a mythological movie? Please correct it. Rtgt (talk) 04:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2023

change mythological to historical Psv4344 (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Do you want provide us evidence on Ramayan not being mythology and being historical? There are enough proof including archeological surveys confirming it to be true. Funnily when I search wiki for Jesus Christ, the word mythology was only used once that too in references.

I don't see Passion of Christ being listed as mythological movie , so stop being ignorant and change mythological to Hindu Epic.

Thanks 122.182.209.182 (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

@Cannolis Noah (2014 film) does this mention that it is a mythological movie based on biblical story? Ram is considered a god and Ramayana is considered history by Hindus and is part of Indian culture. I would dare you to call any other religion a myth or the Gods a mythical creatures. Please don't be a hypocrite and fix it. Rtgt (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

@Cannolis

''The Last Temptation of Christ'' (film) Does it say this is a mythological movie? Please correct it.

Please do not be a hypocrite, and correct the mistake. Rtgt (talk) 04:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made, otherwise you are wasting my time and yours with these inept comparisons. Cannolis (talk) 07:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2023

Hello respected Wiki editors who are managing this page, please dont confuse readers with unofficial numbers where film scored 410+ Crs till now and budget was not more than 450Crs as per producer report. Please change the movie budget from 500 - 700 Cr to 450 Cr. Thank you

"please change ₹500−700 crore (US$−88 million) to ₹400−450 crore (US$−55 million)" Hemanth Sinha (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2023

"please change ₹500−700 crore (US$−88 million) to ₹500−510 crore (US$−61 million)" Hemanth Sinha (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2023 (2)

It not mythological, instead use historical, because Sri Ram actually lived long time back, and there is enough proof of that. 103.77.139.196 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2023

"vikrantronarara" (talk)The south indian language digital rights were acquired by Amazon prime video while the hindi was acquired by Netflix~

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2023

"vikrantronarara" (talk)Digital Rights of Telugu Tamil Kannada and Malayalam were acquired by Amazon prime video while Digital rights Of Hindi language was acquired by Netflix~

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2023 (2)

Change 500 crore collection to 410 crores as that is what is mentioned in the referenced article. 500 crore is incorrect. 49.204.192.55 (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please be more specific on which "500 crore" you are referring to, the article has 4 mentions of "500 crore". — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

About Box Office

Hello, I came across the claim that the film's box office collection reached 410 crores, but it is completely false. The reference they used does not state anywhere that it earned 410 crores. According to reliable sources like Bollywood Hungama, the actual worldwide box office collection is 164.51 crores. Feel free to verify this information with a trustworthy source. https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/adipurush/box-office/ 27.147.202.26 (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Adipurush SouthIndian language Collections not reported in BollywoodHungama page...those numbers r only for Hindi version in NorthIn 2406:B400:B5:6BC5:450F:2B84:393D:CD88 (talk) 16:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

The world wide gross is around 350 crores for 10days according to box office India site and telugu360 site. Verdict is disaster: https://twitter.com/Telugu360/status/1673296253525053441?s=20

The Box Office Collections Could Be Fake Numbers?

The source that is attached on the reference that says it earned 450 crores total has no evidence in it. This could be a fake number? Is there any such entity that verifies global box office collections? 27.34.34.224 (talk) 04:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Positive critical response to cast performances

I think it should be mentioned that despite the overall negative critical reception of the film, acting has been praised. I have read reviews, especially those mentioned in RECEPTION section, and critics did have said some good things about cast performances, not their characters though, particularly of Prabhas and Saif. Erenyeager008 (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Erenyeager008, we cannot read the reviews ourselves and create a reception summary from them. That is a form of original research called synthesis, which is combining multiple sources to form a conclusion that no individual source explicitly states. Synthesis is not permitted on Wikipedia. Also keep in mind that reviews placed in a Wikipedia article are hand-picked by Wikipedia editors. They may or may not represent the consensus of reviews among all critics, which is another reason to avoid summarizing them. In order to include a summary, it must be cited directly to a reliable source that has created the summary for us. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Collection

Total worldwide Gross collection of Adipurush from day 1 to day 12 is 465 crores and the budget of the movie is some around 455 crores all inclusive Flooxi (talk) 08:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2023

Amory ryan (talk) 10:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

see the box office numbers it shows older numbers please update and some people are changing it continously box office please protect it

 Not done for now: If you have reliable sources to update it, please submit another request. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

What is the basis of referencing Ramayana as Mythological

The term mythological is not correct. Please change that to historical 171.76.86.138 (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Better to call it Theological Smart Sherlock (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

History, Mythology and theology are three very distinct feilds. However as far as the article is concerned the term mythological is 157.38.251.189 (talk) 06:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Where is public reviews section? Why do they only talk about critics reviews?

It is possible that the critics could be tipped off to say positive about the films. Why is there no IMDB section where the public is bashing the movie left and right? Also, why is there no YouTube reviews section added where public reviews are recorded. These critics reviews are always biased. There should be a public reviews section added on this page based on how the general public reacted, not the critics from various companies. The only thing that matters is public reviews, not the critics reviews. They are the public viewers who go to the theatre, put money from their pockets to watch the movie. These reviewers from various companies, nobody believes them, most of them are either biased or tipped off. Add a public reviews section where the general public can come and directly write their reception or reviews here. 2400:1A00:BAA0:6B35:EDF7:CEC2:A6D0:F4EA (talk) 21:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Public reviews are not used as their authors have no proven expertise or credibility in the field, additionally they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew. As per MOS:FILMAUDIENCE. Greyjoy ^talk 06:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Budget?

Provide some proofs for the huge budget you've mentioned there. 49.204.112.140 (talk) 11:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Budget is around 500 crores 125 crores Prabhas salary 4 crores Kriti Sanon salary and 10 crores is Saif Ali Khan's salary total money spent on actors fees is around 140 crores 30 crores for music and 250 crores for VFX and 50 crores for promotions Director Om Raut didn't take any fees because he is also one of the producer of the fil so the total budget is in between 470 crores to 490 crores they didn't even spend a single penny kn vfx improvement. Flooxi (talk) 07:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello sir. With the budget you've added, adipurush would not be the most expensive indian film as RRR would exceed its budget, budget of adipurush movie is not more than 400 to 450 crores 1 by benny bharatwaj

https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/adipurushs-500-crore-budget-has-prabhas-taking-130-crore-home-as-the-salary-40-times-more-than-kriti-sanon-12-5-times-more-than-saif-ali-khan/

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/box-office/adipurush-telugu-box-office-day-10-the-telugu-version-of-the-film-collects-close-to-rs-2-5-crores-on-its-10th-day/articleshow/101269423.cms

ADIPURUSH BUDGET Adipurush is estimated to be made on an all-inclusive budget of 460 Crores inclusive of advertising costs and star salary

Star Salary for Prabhas is estimated to be 125 Crores itself

ADIPURUSH PRE-RELEASE BUSINESS All South India theatrical business has been given to people Media at 185 Crores minimum guarantee who in turn have resold it

Satellite & Digital Rights ( All languages): 242 Crores.

Total theatrical + Nontheatrical business To producers: 432 Crores with Music and Overseas rights being with them

Conclusion Whole Budget of adipurush movie is 455 crores and the 12 days collection is 465 crores .

Including VFX Artist Credit - InfoBox

The VFX supervisor of Adipurush is Prasad Sutar, the co-founder of the famous VFX company, NY VFXwaala launched by Ajay Devgn. https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/ahead-of-adipurush-release-films-vfx-supervisor-reveals-how-team-swung-into-action-after-criticism-2385941-2023-05-29

The credits show the company's VFX supervisor Prasad Sutar ... Sutar is one of the producers of the upcoming film.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/ajay-devgn-backed-vfx-company-distances-itself-from-adipurush-after-teaser-attracts-memes-trolls/articleshow/94644344.cms?from=mdr

Adipurush’s visual effects are being supervised by Prasad Sutar ... In 2015, partnering with VFX supervisor Naveen Paul and in collaboration with Ajay Devgn’s production house, Sutar began his own company called NY VFXWaala.

https://www.dnaindia.com/bollywood/report-meet-prasad-sutar-visual-effects-designer-behind-controversial-adipurush-vfx-prabhas-om-raut-ny-vfxwaala-3047768 `·._.·Mεﺎ٧ﺄŋ·._.·´ 02:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Countdredd (talk • contribs)

citations and cast performances

The reviews in the listed citations don't actually address cast peformances, absolutely none of the reviews mention a single cast performance. the title of the citation and the content are polar opposites Johnbritto15 (talk) 21:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the "cast performance" mention for now, but upon further review, there is some praise cited in this Business Today source about halfway down (not just the subtitle). However, it's clear from this source that while Prabhas and Kriti Sanon received praise, the villian did not. So we can't really say "cast performances", because not all of the main characters/actors were praised. We also shouldn't single out and focus on Prabhas or Sanon in the lead section, because this reception summary is already getting pretty wordy. Best to leave cast out of this. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

I think that is just one review nevertheless. I agree with the premise that if the cast performances need to be praised we could just do it with a citation that solely focuses on them They call me Kill Bill Pandey (talk) 04:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Here is a better citation which focuses solely on critic reviews. And we can clearly see that some critics have praised the cast performances.

Adipurush, with its stellar performances and visual grandeur... by https://www.addatoday.com/2023/06/adipurush-movie-review-stellar.html

Saif Ali Khan towers over everybody else....Prabhas has strong screen presence... by https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/adipurush-review-part-planet-of-the-apes-part-king-kong-1-5-stars-4126780

Prabhas is believable as Raghav right from the first scene...Kriti Sanon as Janaki is beautiful on screen...Saif did a rather decent job with it by https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/movies/reviews/story/adipurush-movie-review-prabhas-excels-as-raghav-but-substandard-vfx-is-a-let-down-kriti-sanon-om-raut-2393586-2023-06-16 aggarwala2727 (talk) 06:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

most of the citations don't address cast performances though, for most movies we could find 2-3 reviews that praise a certain aspect, doesn't project a unanimous front, no? They call me Kill Bill Pandey (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

I just linked you 3 reviews that praised the cast performances explicitly. Obviously, some critics are going to go the other way, that doesn't mean the cast performances weren't praised, right? The general consensus on the movie both among watchers and the critics has been in positive of the cast performances. aggarwala2727 (talk) 06:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

yeah I don't disagree with you, I'm just saying how it might look like that's all. this citation is clearly better though They call me Kill Bill Pandey (talk) 06:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

"that doesn't mean the cast performances weren't praised, right?" – Actually, this is why we depend on review aggregators like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic for films in the US. In order to form a summary about reviews, a reliable source that is doing that summary analysis for us is needed. For example, let's say you found 5 reviews praising the cast, but there are in actuality 20 reviews disparaging the cast performances. We can't then say they were generally praised, because that wouldn't be accurate. WP:FILMLEAD specifically requires, "Any summary of the film's critical reception should avoid synthesis, meaning it should reflect an overall consensus explicitly summarized by one or more reliable sources."

If you cannot find a source analyzing multiple reviews and then saying cast performances were generally praised, then we shouldn't be saying that either. Also when it comes to that kind of analysis, the source needs to be highly reputable as well. Some random source looking at a handful of reviews doesn't qualify. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you @GoneIn60, that is my point too. I’m not against the movie, I have just championed for such a reference! Johnbritto15 (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there isn't a similar solution like RT or Metacritic for Indian cinema. Although, this particular film seems to have its own page on RT. Sadly for us, they haven't provided a general consensus like they do for most films. I'm not sure what source is then considered as "highly reputable" for Indian Cinema's critical analysis. In fact, I'd also like to see a reputed source analyzing multiple reviews and affirming that the soundtrack received praise, as is what is visible in the lead section currently.

I'm now surprised not many Indian cinema articles have similar disputes. aggarwala2727 (talk) 17:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aggarwala2727 i think this is because not many movies in indian cinema polarise opinions especially wrt cast performances, imo it is more of a recent thing that has come with superstardom. Johnbritto15 (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it can be a bigger challenge in other countries. I would defer to anyone that has good knowledge of the most reputable Indian sources. If you can find one that others accept as very reliable analyzing multiple reviews, that will probably work. The bottom line is that we can't do our own analysis, which is a form of original research. --GoneIn60 (talk) 03:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 July 2023

Please add new information regarding public Apology on Twitter

Manoj Muntashir Shukla @manojmuntashir

मैं स्वीकार करता हूँ कि फ़िल्म आदिपुरुष से जन भावनायें आहत हुईं हैं. अपने सभी भाइयों-बहनों, बड़ों, पूज्य साधु-संतों और श्री राम के भक्तों से, मैं हाथ जोड़ कर, बिना शर्त क्षमा माँगता हूँ. भगवान बजरंग बली हम सब पर कृपा करें, हमें एक और अटूट रहकर अपने पवित्र सनातन और महान देश की सेवा करने की शक्ति दें!🙏 I accept people’s emotions have been hurt by Adipurush. With folded hands, I extend my unconditional apologies. May Prabhu Bajrang Bali keep us united and grant us strength to serve our sacred Sanatan and our great nation.🙏

8 July 2023

Jeaucques (talk) 11:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

 Already done – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 July 2023

Ljgv (talk) 09:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Adipurush boxoffice 450 core its ofical please correct this

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Twitter is not reliable. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)