Talk:Ageha Ohkawa

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Anime and manga

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles

Visual arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Blood type

Why do these articles include blood type? I know the cultural meaning in Japan, but it's not suitable to just put information based on superstition. It would be like putting in someone's astrological profile just because they're American or in a country where astrology is popular. Nathan J. Yoder 05:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Gene Nygaard 05:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Don't be moving pages like this without discussion and without references.

And especially don't be messing up the sort keys for the categories, which would still have been the correct ones even if moved. See Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category. Gene Nygaard 05:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(old) Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Moved.
— $V = I * R$ (talk to Ω) 09:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ageha Okawa → Ageha Ohkawa — I messed up the name which has a h in the family name in the text when rverting an undiscussed, unreferenced attempt to move it, which was accompanied by a change to make it missort in categories as well. —Gene Nygaard 13:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

done --Duk 14:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for fixing my typo. That shouldn't be determinative as to whether or not it should have a macron, so if somebody else wants to discuss it that, then you could go to WP:RM. Gene Nygaard 14:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ageha Ohkawa to Nanase Ohkawa

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus
— $V = I * R$ (talk to Ω) 00:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since Ohkawa has officially changed her pen name back to Nanase Ohkawa, should the article be moved to reflect that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.5.55 (talk) 02:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for this information? As far as I know, she hasn't change it back. But if she did change it back, the article has to be moved (not copy-pasted).--Nohansen (talk) 16:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to her profile (http://www.clamp-net.com/html/contents/profile/) as of this comment, Ohkawa is currently using the pen name 大川七瀬 (Ohkawa Nanase). This blogger (http://chibiyuuto.livejournal.com/177147.html) makes a note of this back when Ohkawa originally changed her name from "Ageha" to "Nanase" again. 24.84.218.226 (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting move: Ageha Ohkawa to Nanase Ohkawa

In the previous section, the user noted that Ohkawa has returned to using "Nanase Ohkawa" from "Ageha Ohkawa".

According to her profile (http://www.clamp-net.com/html/contents/profile/) as of this comment, Ohkawa is currently using the pen name 大川七瀬 (Ohkawa Nanase). This blogger (http://chibiyuuto.livejournal.com/177147.html) makes a note of this back when Ohkawa originally changed her name from "Ageha" to "Nanase" again. 24.84.218.226 (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is the name that Ohkawa is currently and has previously used, I think that the article should be renamed to Nanase Ohkawa to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EikaKou (talk • contribs) 01:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as there is no response to this discussion, I am going to move Ageha Ohkawa to Nanase Ohkawa. If there is opposition, it can be discussed on this page. A22 (talk) 00:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

movereq|Nanase Ohkawa

Ageha Ohkawa → Nanase Ohkawa — The discussion above provides references that confirm that Ageha Ohkawa is currently using the pen name Nanase Ohkawa again. However, the page cannot be renamed to Nanase Ohkawa since the page already exists and currently redirects to Ageha Ohkawa. A22 (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The references really need to be used in the article. Coudl you guys please copy edit the article body to conform with WP:LEAD and to use at least some inline reliable references?

Unless and until there are verifiable and reliable, third party references, my opinion on this is going to remain Oppose. That she prefers a different convention can and should be used in the article body, but unless it can be established that (for example) magazines or other media have changed, then Wikipedia shouldn't change (See WP:OR).
—

V = I * R

(talk to Ω) 09:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.