This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose – no good primarytopic case has been presented. Dicklyon (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
In what way has it not been presented? What other topics have a claim? A gBooks check for "Air Transport Command" shows only three results in the first 9 pages of results that are not referring to this - and of those one a misnaming of the RAF Transport Command and the other is a translation of Groupement des Moyens Militaire de Transports Aeriens. - The BushrangerOne ping only 02:47, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Why was this page moved to Air Transport Command (USAF)???? The command was a part of the United States Air Force for only a brief time. It was a World War II command of the United States Army Air Forces for nearly five years. This was NOT what I concurred with during the move request. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
I do not see where the discussion to move this article was concluded. The USAF disambiguation was not part of the discussion; in fact the discussion was to remove the disambiguation alltogether Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
didn't see the discussion! Point taken about USAAF. Change it to Air Transport Command (US) or (USAAF)!Petebutt (talk) 18:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose this suggestion. Support original suggestion. Parenthetical is not required for disambiguation. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
No need to create multiple redirects as it appears this is the primary topic. GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose It is not clear that a casual mention of an "air transport command" would be "highly likely" and "much more likely" per wp:primarytopic to refer to the American than to the British or Canadian ones. Also, I'd consider "(US)" or "(USAAF)" a better disambiguator per WP:MILMOS#UNITS. walkvictor falktalk 07:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
The RAF unit never had the word "Air" in it. I found the relatively new European Air Transport Command organization so have added it to disambig. But don't think that dilutes Primary Topic argument (significantly). GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
And I've just moved it back as controversial. The user who moved it has a history of making...unconventional...page moves but never quite to the point of anything being done about it. - The BushrangerOne ping only 21:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Support move to Air Transport Command as primary topic. MilborneOne (talk) 19:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.