This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
I do not understand the reasons for this speedy deletion.
First, I would like to state that I have no conflict of interest nor connexion to this company.
Second, all the statements in this article are properly sourced, and per my judgement several of the references are secondary sources which provide analysis of the company in the context of the market and technology landscape.
Third, regarding the reason for speedy deletion ("Unambiguous advertising or promotion"), I find it unfair. I have taken care to qualify statements that are favorable to the company: e.g. " It is said by Akselos technology users" or "According to the company". I would be more than happy to include more negative views on the technology and company, but have not found them in sources so far. It is difficult to explain the motivations for a complex technology to non experts without mentioning its perceived advantages.
I am of course fully opened to explicit feedback on how the text would be improved, in particular how to reduce the perception that the article would be promotional.
Factfox (talk) 19:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your comments. I would say that it starts badly by referring to awards won, but I don't find it promotional in tone overall. Deb (talk) 08:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deb Thank you. I removed the mention of the award won at the beginning of the history section, it was indeed not necessary. Factfox (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
