Talk:Albanian principalities

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania Mid‑importance

	Albanian principalities is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dates

If League of Lezhe was confederation, then principalities that constituted it were still independent and not ceased to exist in 1444. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who said that they ceased to exist? --Sulmues ^(talk) 15:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albania in Middle Ages

Unresolved

"The term Albanian Principalities refers to a number of principalities created in the Middle Ages in Albania."

"Most of these principalities were united in 1444 under the Albanian state, called League of Lezha."

Albania did not exist in middle ages. It was founded almost 500 years after this principalities. I propose significant change of the above mentioned text of the article. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I reject that significant change. Please read Albanian Principalities well. Albania existed believe it or not. --Sulmues ^(talk) 15:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of belief, but sources. Schmitt, Oliver Jens (2001), Das venezianische Albanien (1392-1479), München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH München, p. 47, ISBN 3-486-56569--9, Albanien war im Mittelalter kein staat. (Albania was not a state in the Middle Ages.) {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laydate=, |separator=, |doi-inactive-date=, |chapterurl=, |laysummary=, |month=, and |lastauthoramp= (help)--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also "There was no independent Albanian culture. It is therefore recommended to introduce the term "region of Albania" instead of Albania, so no associations can come up with a political entity or a particular culture, but to point out that "Albania" in the Middle Ages is a geographic concept.Schmitt, Oliver Jens (2001), Das venezianische Albanien (1392-1479), München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH München, p. 47, ISBN 3-486-56569--9, Eine eigenständige albanische Kultur gab es nicht. Es empfiehlt sich deshalb, Anstelle von Albanien den Terminus "albanischer Raum" einzuführen, der keine Assoziationen mit einem politischen Gebilde oder einer besonderen Kultur aufkommen lässt, sondern darauf hinweist, das "Albanien" im Mittelalter ein geographicer Begriff ist. {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laydate=, |separator=, |doi-inactive-date=, |chapterurl=, |laysummary=, |month=, and |lastauthoramp= (help); no-break space character in |quote= at position 19 (help)--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support merge into Albania in the Middle Ages as per Antid.--Zoupan (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)~~ Blocked sock:Ajdebre.[reply]

I'd oppose this... it's pretty useful to have a page that gathers all the various local fiefdoms that the Albania was broken into at the time (though this page is missing a few, like the Zaharia family's estate...). Dealing with each of them separately on such a broad page like Albania in the Middle Ages would really be rather bothersome.--Yalens (talk) 01:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Principalities → Albanian principalities – This seems to be more a case of a conglomeration of principalities rather than an entity of itself. When a single entity was formed, it was not under this name. As such, I see no grammatical justification for the capitalisation of the second word. I would have simply been bold over this move were it not for imminent Main Page coverage, and the danger of redlinks. Kevin McE (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is not even a case of conglomerate. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. While a capitalised P would be correct if the term 'Albanian Principalities' was a proper name, an examination of sources on Google Search, Google Scholar and Google Books reveals almost no sources that use the term as such. This seems to be a clear example of 'Albanian principalities', not the 'Albanian Principalities'. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 03:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Unsourced flag

With this edit (diff) one editor edit warred to insert the flag which is not sourced by reliable source. That is confirmed by admin Cplakidas with this edit (diff). No reliable sources - no addition to wikipedia. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The flag is plausible in so far as the double-headed eagle is known to have been used by Skanderbeg, but it warrants a better source for this specific arrangement. The same goes for the coat of arms which was (and now is again) used instead; the eagle with the six-pointed star are well attested, but I'd like to know where the arrangement with the crossed spears etc came from. I like nice flags and illustrations as much as the next guy, but this is a field where so much misinformation is rife, that we should strive (and as WP is an encyclopedia, are obligated to strive) for reliable and verifiable sourcing. Constantine ✍ 23:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]