Talk:Alseodaphne ridleyi
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alseodaphne ridleyi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Etymology and Extracting Info From a Source
[edit]Is it possible that this species is named after Henry Nicholas Ridley? He seems to have been quite the figure in the region and he has other species named after him. If this were discovered, it would probably be good for this article and the article on Ridley himself.
This source from 1910 has more information, and it looks like it is saying that someone named Ridley described the organism in question. But that doesn't prove it's the same person. It would probably be good if someone obtained more information from that source, but it's a little hard to read the Latin.