Talk:Alseodaphne ridleyi

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alseodaphne ridleyi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology and Extracting Info From a Source[edit]

Is it possible that this species is named after Henry Nicholas Ridley? He seems to have been quite the figure in the region and he has other species named after him. If this were discovered, it would probably be good for this article and the article on Ridley himself.

This source from 1910 has more information, and it looks like it is saying that someone named Ridley described the organism in question. But that doesn't prove it's the same person. It would probably be good if someone obtained more information from that source, but it's a little hard to read the Latin.

Prometheus720 (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]