Talk:Amenemhat II
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amenemhat II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anubis
[edit]The article about the Sphinx says the statue may have been of Anubis initially, was damaged, and was recarved. That would be plausible, since the jaw is strangely jutting, the long jackal nose would be unsupported, and limestone is very soft. A single line of weakness would doom it..45Colt 21:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC) .45Colt 21:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Wepwawetō
[edit]Ist not the coregenci in 44 regnal year Amenemhat II. and 2 regnal year Senusret II. proved in talles of Sinuhe? I hawe one copy and there is writen that the "Dual King Kheperkare, Son of Re Senwosret- may he live for all time and eternity!" Bynk--195.91.6.28 (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- C-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Ancient Egypt articles
- Mid-importance Ancient Egypt articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles