Talk:American VI: Ain't No Grave

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Critical Reception/Reviews

Just leave the ratings in the sidebar as usual, will you? We shouldn't place them below it. It looks weird and isn't Wikipedia standard. Andy Pipkin (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 18:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proper addition of reviews

Please stop If reviews are added to the infobox, I will revert them. The Reviews field of {{Infobox Album}} is deprecated in favor of text and the use of a different template. I will add those reviews to the proper section as time permits, but it would just be easier if other users who want to add reviews will do so in the proper fashion themselves. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have now violated the three-revert rule.BillyJack193 (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No I have not. You don't understand what that is, or you are making that allegation in bad faith. You're clearly being intransigent, so I'm going to have to ask for someone who has not been editing this article to give some attention to it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake. For some reason, I felt you and another editor were the same person. But I looked at the revision history and indeed you did not. I apologize. The language in the article you originally posted was not clear. However, the article for the album templates was very clear and you were right. Again, I apologize (although, I will admit that I do not like the change in policiy).BillyJack193 (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All's well Thank you so much for reviewing the guideline and admitting that you were mistaken. It's a breath of fresh air to not have someone fight me every step of the way when applying a guideline. Accidents happen and I am happy to have someone else who wants to contribute to this article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only asking this because you will find that the star ratings are in the infobox of every single article about a music album. And you have to admit that it looks way better that way. Some random examples:

I mean, is it really worth rewriting all those hundreds and hundreds of articles? If you must, have fun doing it, I just wanted to express my astonishment. Cheers. Andy Pipkin (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus This is the consensus and it was reached recently, so you are correct that there are at least 70,000 album articles that are currently breaking it. Whether or not it's worth changing them is really contingent on whether or not you think consensus is worthwhile. As for the aesthetics, I definitely would prefer it in the infobox of this article, but once it gets more text to push down the critical reception section, that will fix itself. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also Some articles that do not have it (noticed that they are GA or FA):

Etc. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Once there is more text it'll look better. Ok, so that's settled. Bye! Andy Pipkin (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

"...Cash's ability to record another solid collection of songs after his death..." The way this is worded makes it sound as if Cash recorded the songs after he died, which is ridiculous. --S-man 02:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --S-man 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Aint No Grave & The Undertaker

When you read about most Albums on wiki, there usually is a section that talks about songs from that album in popular culture. This album's article makes no such effort, despite the fact that the song Aint No Grave has made several popular culture appearances, including the Undertaker's short term use of it as a theme for his entrance.

The song has its own article and within that article, the Undertaker's use of the song is covered. If the song didn't have its own article, it might warrant a brief mention here but as it does have an article, it doesn't really need to be mentioned there AND here. NJZombie (talk) 03:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]