Talk:Anastas Kullurioti

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Albania High‑importance

	Anastas Kullurioti is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Alexikoua/Factuarius: I gently asked you (16:47, 8 November 2009) to discuss changes first on the talk pages. Albanian is not synonymous with Muslim. Maybe Greek is same for Eastern Orthodox. Editwarring and editskirmishing is not good. Let's discuss first on the talk page. Guildenrich (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

Some of the sources used in this article do not satisfy WP:RS. Partisan souces like Skendi and the nationalists like Faik Konica are not acceptable. As for Edwin Jacques, what can I say? This guy was a Roman Catholic priest, and not anything resembling a historian. His book contains nonsense about Albanians being descended from Pelasgians and the ancient Greeks being Albanians. While that may make him a hero to Albanian ultranationalists, that makes him anything BUT a WP:RS. He sohuld not be used in this or any articles on this encyclopedia. --Athenean (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skendi is acceptable, let's discuss him. Konica may be considered as a primary source, whereas Jacques is better than nothing. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 16:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]