Talk:Andrews University Seminary Studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Seventh-day Adventist Church Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability, third party sources[edit]

When considering the suitability of an article on an academic journal, there is a simple test of independent evaluation: has the journal been deemed worthy of allocation of an ISSN. There are very many university, scholarly society and other groups who produce periodicals and apply for ISSNs, yet have the application rejected for various reasons. There are also very many ISSNs allocated to periodicals that would not be deemed academic journals by the academic community.

A more meaningful test of the notability of a journal, which is also independently evaluated, is inclusion in major indexes in its scholarly discipline. Further selection is possible in many cases, because journals are sometimes rated, by impact factor or other criteria.

Tags like the ones I've removed show nothing except that the tagger is unfamiliar with the journal, and with how to make simple checks regarding journals. What would be more helpful is for there to be objective guidelines for required impact factor or other criteria in order to be deemed notable at Wikipedia. If Wikipedia desires articles to be at a high-school kind of level, then it will exclude low impact factor journals in favour of only the most widely known journals. If Wikipedia desires to cover more subject territory and be more reliable, it will include low impact factor journals, particularly in specialist areas.

In any case, AUSS, is very well known in religious studies, which is easily verified by those with genuine interest and basic knowledge regarding journals. Without interest in or basic knowledge about the subject, one wonders what motivates any such tagging editors to declare such things about themselves in tags, which add no information for readers, nor useful help for other editors. Friedrich Müller (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrews University Seminary Studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]