Talk:Angela Buchdahl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angela Warnick Buchdahl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angela Warnick Buchdahl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

The Buchdahl article has been vandalized by a zealot who appears to want anything removed that is not consistent with or is not of interest under his/her interpretation of jewish law. This is antithetical to Wikipedia policy. If it continues I will ask for protection of the article from this vandalism. VanEman (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with VanEman. Veni Markovski | Вени Марковски (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On January 1st and 2nd 2020, an anonymous user has entered a number of times different edits, which are not relevant to the article. They included, among others, opinions and POV of the author as to who is a Jew ("supported" by references to Wikipedia articles as sources for inclusion of his/her opinion); removal of reference to Newsweek "Most Influential Rabbis" (wrongly stating that there's no such publication); other controversial edits. If the anonymous author wants to contribute to the article, but doesn't know how, then (s)he should first introduce the changes on this page, and ask other editors for comments. Veni Markovski | Вени Марковски (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted a request for protection of the article from vandalism. VanEman (talk) 02:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Though, it seems the person has stopped for the day? Veni Markovski | Вени Марковски (talk) 02:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted a request for protection to this article given the vandalism. The powers that be are prepared to intervene if the vandalism starts up again:

"Angela Warnick Buchdahl[edit] Angela Warnick Buchdahl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - vandlaism and violations of BLP policy. Buchdalh is a Reform Jewish rabbi. Vandals of a different religious stream of Judaism remove items they believe make her a "bad Jew" or because references are not to religious websites. Example is a deletion of her membership in Yale "Skull and Bones Society" whose member include George W Bush and John Kerry: "curprev 05:18, 2 January 2020‎ 141.226.9.49 talk‎ 13,963 bytes -591‎ Undid revision 933566693 by VanEman (talk) Membership in a non-Jewish quasi-religious organization "The Brotherhood of Death" validate that she a bad Jew and should be under a separate section called 'Controversies'. Removed reference to her conversion becasue there is no reference to it at her Central Synagogue website. undo Tag: Undo"

VanEman (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Automated comment: @VanEman: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC) Fixed template formatting so the bot should be happy. –Erakura(talk) 02:50, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Not done The disruption appears to have stopped. If it resumes, ping me and I'l protect it. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)"

"Converts to Reform Judaism"[edit]

I don't think this category is appropriate. Based on the article, she was raised Reform Jewish and is currently Reform Jewish without having belonged to any other religion in the interim. It looks like she did a giyur ceremony as a personal thing but I don't think that would justify us including her in the converts category. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 01:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]