Talk:Angular diameter distance
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angular diameter distance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the angular size redshift relation page were merged into Angular diameter distance. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
It is requested that a diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Proposed merge from angular size redshift relation
[edit]Done |
I'm proposing to merge the article Angular size redshift relation into this one as a separate section, because it's an aspect of the same subject and I think both 'articles' would be improved by being together on the same page. Let me know what you think. Cosmo0 19:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Graph contains incorrect plot
[edit]The plot of angular distance in megaparsecs has a correct "reference plot" and incorrect "your plot" which uses H/H0 = (density parameters) instead of H/H0 = (density parameters)^1/2. Speno35 (talk) 06:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Images and/or Diagrams needed
[edit]Images and or diagrams of the object at a distance illustrating that formula, and the expanding universe effect would make these concepts much clearer to most of our readers who don't deal well with formulae. — Lentower (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
xkcd Graphics of Angular Diameter Turnaround
[edit]These xkcd graphics lead me to this article. If someone could get the author to allow use here, it be a large win for this article. As of 21 May 2022[update], xkcd is much clearer than the text & formulae in this article. — Lentower (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- I was going to say xkcd's CC licensed so permission already exists. But the footer (on xkcd's desktop site) says it's licensed under CC-BY-NC 2.5, whereas Wikimedia Commons's licensing page indicates that CC BY-NC isn't accepted. Maybe Wikipedia itself has somewhat looser licensing requirements for images (e.g., "fair use"), but that still has to pass relevance. Personally, I find the heavy layering in the comic too confusing for it to be worth using, but I guess you can try contacting Munroe via social media links in the header or the email address in the licensing page. 66.210.249.135 (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- Astronomy articles needing images
- Start-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested photographs of physics subjects
- Wikipedia requested diagram images