Talk:Anzac railway line

This article was nominated for merging with Sydney Metro (2008 proposal) on 8 August 2015. The result of the discussion was Merge.

New Zealand

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Anzac railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

stations to be served

The list of stations on the cover of the SMH was unsourced, and I can find no collaborating information. I am only certain that a few stations like Moore Park and Drummoyne are in the proposal Kransky 13:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense conjecture dressed as fact

The article states

"The line was announced in September 2007 alongside plans to postpone construction of an underground link between Redfern and Chatswood"

This "announcement", as far as I'm aware, was not made by RailCorp, TIDC, or the NSW Government. It was instead a report by a newspaper on a 'meeting of transport bosses', where supposedly at this meeting the Anzac line was proposed and there was discussion of dropping the Redfern-Chatswood line.

All of this is of course based on conjecture contained in the newspaper article and has no place in an encyclopedia. The current status as far as the government seems to indicate is that this Anzac line is a non-official proposal (ie. not anywhere near being officially implemented and not officially being proposed) while the Redfern-Chatswood line (CBD link), remains a current and official proposed project.

60.241.179.94 (talk) 02:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then what do you call Morris Iemma's announcement this morning (11 December) that the Anzac metro would be a reality and it was "not a question of if, but when"? The line is not complete conjecture - it's a proposed line, it's just not yet in the planning stages like the other lines. If you want to contribute properly, please sign up to Wikipedia instead of writing nonsense as an anonymous user where no one will take you seriously. JRG (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split into North West Metro and South East Metro

The entire Anzac line is split into North West Metro (from St James to Top Ryde), and the South East Metro (from St James to Malabar). This article should be split and merged with the corresponding articles too. --Pikablu0530 (talk) 06:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - except according to the policy document the South East Metro is just to be an extension of the North West Metro, so it should be merged onto the same page. The Anzac Line stuff should be left as an historical record of what was originally proposed - the ECRL page has almost nothing on the former Parramatta Rail Link proposal, so we don't want to repeat that. JRG (talk) 11:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Articles

I would be careful about expending too much time and effort on articles like this, as realistically the track record of the NSW government suggests that they all have little chance of ever being built. These plans anmd proposols seem to come and go at ministerila whim.i wouls suggest merging this, the West Metro and maybe even the North West Metro into a Metro proposals for Sydney (or something) page. That way if it all gets dumped, which I am sure it will, then there will be some historical record.MrHarper (talk) 06:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's leave it for the moment and wait and see. At the moment none of the lines have a status such that they have been dumped and are not going to be built at all. As long as the "proposed line" tag is on the articles Wikipedia policy says it's ok to keep these articles. JRG (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]