Talk:Army CHESS
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I think substantial encyclopedic content might remain after removing the promotional material. US defence procurement is a multi-billion dollar exercise I would think this deserves the full attention and discussion of an Afd. --Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree this should stay as it's noted in seemingly independent source, fcw.com. Although, I see issues with the first source, as following it doesn't provide me with any supporting information. From what I could gather, I believe they're the company behind this so it doesn't feel very independent. Drewmutt (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Stub-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles