|Arthur Cayley has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Is it named for Arthur Cayley? If so should we put it in Arthur_Cayley#List_of_notions_named_for_Arthur_Cayley? Tosha
Where did this come from?
I am curious where the text for this article comes from. I would guess the bulk of it was not written by a Wikipedian; the style seems a bit dated. It would be nice to have sources for some of these quotes. Quasicharacter 07:22, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
On a related note, the mystery author (whom I shall name M.A.) doesn't seem to have a particularly NPOV. For instance, M.A. seems to have a grudge against "evolution philosophers". Quasicharacter 07:30, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Cayley genealogy: www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/british/cc4aq/cayley2.htm shows that merchant Henry Cayley, father of mathematician Arthur Cayley, is NOT brother to aeronautical pioneer and Wikipedia subject Sir George Cayley (1773-1857).
- It came from a book, verbatim. This is a Project Gutenberg PDF file of Lectures on Ten British Mathematicians of the 19th Century, by Alexander MacFarlane, written in 1915. It might be public domain by now, but should at least be credited. Some bits need reworking, too; there's first person in there, which is what started me searching. Good call about the "dated" style. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- You have just volunteered to do some research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I don't like this article
This Article focuses too much on the circumstances of his life and not enough on summarizing his work. Granted, there are links to discussions of various aspects of his work, but a real overview is missing.
another article: http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/periodictable/html/C.html similarly vague about what he did.
Here's a good article
http://www.siam.org/meetings/la09/talks/higham.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section., and are posted here for posterity. Following
|Lengthy article, but it covers its topic well. The prose seems to be very clumsy at points, almost yoda-like(see the section about him receiving a chair at Cambridge). Besides this bit of oddness, a few in-line citations would really put this article on track for GA.--Cronholm144 00:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)|
Last edited at 00:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)