Talk:Arthur Lindegren

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Swimming Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

@BeanieFan11: Were you able to find any significant coverage? As an interview that doesn't appear to contain any analysis, I don't believe that is an independent source. BilledMammal (talk) 14:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is significant. Just because there are quotes doesn't discount it. And there's other pieces of coverage such as [1] where he made the headlines of a paper, [2] [3] [4], etc. I think that's a GNG pass. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is a clear pass; the first one for instance doesn't constitute independent coverage, as it doesn't say anything about Lindegren that Lindegren does not say himself. However, it also isn't a clear failure; I'll look into it further and see what I can find. BilledMammal (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]