Talk:Ashburnham and Penhurst

(banners removed)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ashburnham and Penhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090225212151/http://www.rother.gov.uk/media/pdf/l/l/NOTICE_OF_ELECTION_2007_Town___Parish_Councils.pdf to http://www.rother.gov.uk/media/pdf/l/l/NOTICE_OF_ELECTION_2007_Town___Parish_Councils.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ashburnham and Penhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.europarl.org.uk/uk_meps/MembersMain.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930021652/http://www.sussex-opc.org/ParishPages/P/Penhurst/PenhurstMain.htm to http://www.sussex-opc.org/ParishPages/P/Penhurst/PenhurstMain.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the article[edit]

I notice this article is about two villages/civil parishes, apparently on the sole basis they share a parish council. There is no place called "Ashburnham and Penhurst". Parish councils are rarely notable but, as an alternative to deletion, I suggest the article is split into Ashburnham, East Sussex and Penhurst, East Sussex with a brief overview of the parish council on each village's article.

Crouch, Swale has already created a draft article for Penhurst, currently at Draft:Penhurst, East Sussex, so I suggest this is moved to article mainspace and Ashburnham and Penhurst is renamed as Ashburnham, East Sussex and edited accordingly.

NB Ashburnham, East Sussex was boldly merged to Ashburnham and Penhurst in 2008. Whatever the solution to this situation, we're going to lose the edit history for one of these pages, but I'm open to alternatisve strategies to sort this problem out. Sionk (talk) 11:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sionk: I'd personally split/restore the Penhurst as suggested and then also restore Ashburnham, East Sussex then move any content at Ashburnham and Penhurst to Ashburnham, East Sussex and then redirect Ashburnham and Penhurst to Ashburnham, East Sussex with attribution. As you note unlike Histon which was moved to the longer name after merging Impington this article has always been at this title while Ashburnham, East Sussex is an older article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sionk, Furius, and Clarityfiend: Is it time to enact the AFC and merge Draft:Penhurst, East Sussex in? Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]