Talk:Silsila Azeemiyya

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mysticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mysticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mysticism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MysticismWikipedia:WikiProject MysticismTemplate:WikiProject MysticismMysticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If anyone needs this article to be cleaned up ask me i am an azeemi and i got experience on making wiki pages. I've already cleaned up this article up to wikipedia standards--G Zak S (talk) 16:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guys plz create an account & discuss b4 U edit Farhansher 08:12, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks like a possible copyvio. It's also totally filled with POV terms and phrases such as "Peace be upon him" and other such drivel. Needs a lot of work. Babajobu 22:35, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the remaining 'peace be upon him' phrases, not because I don't wish peace upon Mohammad or anyone else, but because such language doesn't really fit in an encyclopedia. I also tried to improve the article's appearance by normalizing the capitalization of the section headings, and a few other touch-ups. I think its overall appearance is good enough to warrant removing the 'cleanup' tag, so I will. However, much of it is still written from a strong Sufi POV, and that should be addressed before the NPOV tag is removed. Wesley 16:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the article to before the copyrighted text was added from here (be careful, it is password protected and may crash your browser). -- Kjkolb 21:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a disclaimer stating that traditional Sufi orders do not recognize ijaza or authorization that isn't witnessed by others, and that does not date back unbroken to the Prophet (SAWS). BurhanB 14 Feb 2006

Thank you for your comments. I would like to point out that the ijaza or authorization was not 'unwitnessed' in this case. The Azeemia spiritual order has an unbroken chain of authorization however it was only 'named' as such in 1960. A similar example would be the 'Qadiriya' spiritual order which was there before Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani but was named 'AFTER' him as he was the most celebrated figure in its history.(Umairdr82 (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

With profound apologies to Wikipedia and its management and its global free contributors to its portals, I am forced to ask a terse question here. Is this veritable, honest and freely available knowledge database to all and sundry on the internet, the only one of its kind as of now in this world, being allowed to be a repository of storytales and gossips and wild imaginations of any one who wishes to come here and drop them? And everytime such a concocted piece of nonsense comes up, will the moderators simply mark the article as doubtful and subject to discussion? Do you have that kind of serverspace?

This fallacious account of any person's (whether Muslim Sufi or not) getting spiritually guided in 1960AD by the Prophet Muhammad, who had expired in 632AD, is not acceptable to any sane mind. To a practicing Muslim like me, the spiritual guidance if any can be attained from the Holy Quran and the Traditions of the Prophet and perhaps from a living seer and saint of today and certainly not from a prophet who had died centuries ago. What was the unique media which the founder of this unheard of silslia (lineology) of Sufiism, had used to communicate with and get spiritual guidance from the prophet Muhammad, which can never be accessed by any other human? These cheap gimmicks are advertised in yellow press papers (and perhaps in regulars too), to lure the uneducated to avail magical cures and benifits by thugs. The fact that Wikipedia allows these pieces of rubbish to occupy its space is really sad. Lutfullah 13:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Lutfullah[reply]

It seems that one of the followers has gone and totally changed the original article. I'm a Muslim, and follow a tariqa, but this article is definitely not objective or impartial.BurhanB 03:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Azeemiyya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110509195200/http://www.azeemia-isb.org:80/index.php to http://www.azeemia-isb.org/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]