Talk:Azzun Atma

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Azzun Atma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/fullMaps_Sa.nsf/luFullMap/BB0D1D0CC89A371F8525706F00517495/$File/healthinforum_HLT_westbank_opt110205.pdf?OpenElement
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130406145243/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=395 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=395
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=833
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070107044708/http://www.poica.org:80/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=915 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=915
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1203
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090714053950/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1820 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1820
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=2193
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=2352
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=4020

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1596 data

HA#p.135 clearly marks this place, (152/169), as the place noted in the 1596 defter, in Nahiya Jabal Qubal. But is HA correct?

Note that the 1596 data just calls the place for 'Azzun.

From the other history, it seems as if Azzun (155/175) is a possible choice. Alas, Azzun is located straight between P29 and P30 in Nahiya Bani Sa’b; that is Kafr Laqif and Islah, Qalqilya. Still, that is straight on the border between the two Nahiyas. Does archeological data from Azzun rule it out? I dont know. Until it does: lets keep our minds open, Huldra (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]