Talk:Bangladesh–Pakistan relations

A fact from Bangladesh–Pakistan relations appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 734 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in a major improvement in bilateral relations in 2008, Pakistan proposed sharing nuclear technology with Bangladesh?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/May.

Wikipedia

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title of article

"Pakistan" is a proper noun, and "Bangladeshi" is an adjective.

Why is this article not titled "Pakistani-Bangladeshi relations" or "Pakistan-Bangladesh" relations? You wouldn't refer to "Poland-German relations." KConWiki (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I have now moved the article Pahari Sahib 02:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the move is incorrect, and does not match the convention. All other articles on bilateral relations use the country names rather than the adjectives ... the current title is also misleading as it gives the hint of relationship between Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, rather than the two countries. I'm moving it to Pakistan-Bangladesh relations. Also, isn't the convention for bilateral relations to use alphabetical order in the country names? --Ragib (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coming to think of it, you do have a point here *pinches self* with the first issue you raise :-), perhaps it should be Pakistan-Bangladesh relations, as for the second point this is not the case, have you seen, for example, Indo-Bangladeshi relations? Pahari Sahib 08:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trade volume

The section Establishment and growth of bilateral relations states that "Trade between the two countries currently stands at $340 million", with "currently" not defined. The section Trade states that "The total value of trade (export plus import) between the two countries in 2010-11 was about $983 million." What gives?Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong map of India

The map shown for India is inaccurate. Authors might be liable to legal action if no changes are made in the next 15 days. 45.115.89.186 (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you file that lawsuit?

Map is still the same... looks like only talk. Mightygoose (talk) 07:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]