Talk:Bastion (comics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:BastionxlegendsII.jpg[edit]

Image:BastionxlegendsII.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Xm067.png[edit]

Image:Xm067.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bastion not created by Waid/Kubert[edit]

This article makes a common wiki mistake...listing the creators of a character's first appearance as the character's actual creators. Bastion only made a shadowy cameo in X-Men #52. Bastion was actually created by Scott Lobdell and designed by Pascual Ferry, whose design sketches even appear in the June 1996 X-Facts page. Proteusmp3 (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Powers[edit]

This artcle needs an section that explains his powers.98.71.198.136 (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the section on powers as it was both unreferenced completely and also a potential copyright violation. It was very clearly copied from another website, but I could not ascertain for sure the first source of the text. Wikis are usually under some sort of CC-by-SA so probably not WP:COPYVIO but it'd be hard to confirm regardless Soni (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]