Talk:Battle of Kalavrye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Battle of Kalavrye is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2016.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Kalavrye/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    A couple of refs need place of publication
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Nice graphics, but the labels and colors don't match.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Doh! I feel stupid for the colour label thing. Fixed now, and added the usual locations in sources. What exactly is the problem with 2A? Constantine 01:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Nothing, just one I missed checking off.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Section heading howler[edit]

It's been miserable here weatherwise for the last few days, so I need something to cheer me up. This article (the featured one for today, Friday 19th February 2016) fits the bill perfectly. The text for the article has apparently been transcluded from some other website, but the process has missed the wonderful schoolboy howler in the 4th heading "After Maths". This should, of course, read "Aftermath", but PLEASE, Wikipedians, PLEASE, can we keep the original in? lol

  In my (happy) schooldays, after Maths we usually had either Geography or Latin, if memory serves me well. Got your primer ready? Shall we have a quick translation test? RaynesParkGuy (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE - Oh no, someone's corrected the howler while I was writing my original comment! Well spotted, whoever you are - spoilsport! RaynesParkGuy (talk) 10:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)