Talk:Battle of Surfaces
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
statistics
[edit]They changes sides didn't they? The youtube videos on the official page suggest so. Who did better in what part? Are there statistics (unforced errors etc.) separated by halfs? JanCK 23:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, the match was freaking cool. If they didn't change sides the game would have been extremely easy for the player in the clay. The disproportion of being on clay while your opponent is on grass balanced out in the moments when the player on the grass served. It was cool there were thus moments in which it was easier for a player to break the service of the other. The tiebreak was far more interesting too, although I wonder how much the positions of both players when the tiebreak begun determined the odds for them. --euyyn 06:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
File:BattleSurfacesMinibanner.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:BattleSurfacesMinibanner.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:BattleSurfacesMinibanner.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |