Talk:Battle of Szack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Szack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: European / Polish / Russian & Soviet / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Undiscussed move

This article was recently moved from battle of Szack to battle of Shatsk without discussion or an explanation. English sources prefer Szack, as "Battle Szack 1939 -wikipedia" on Google Print gives us 382 hits, whereas "Battle Shatsk 1939 -wikipedia" gives us 4. Per WP:COMMONNAME I am reverting this move and restoring the name that was stable for many years. Please use WP:RM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet Losses

- are taken from a delusional wartime propaganda polish article. Even the polish wiki now has quite different, much lower figures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.82.32.27 (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The issue has been adressed.Tvoi Ded (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

How was this a polish victory if a)the poles were forced to retreat b)they suffered far greater losses, than the Soviets (RKKA captured 1100 prisoners and killed hundreds more with the loss of ~200 men?) Appears to be a Soviet victory. Tvoi Ded (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Szack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304164000/http://www.obiektyw.net/artykul/z-bolszewikami-nie-walczyc-13.html to http://www.obiektyw.net/artykul/z-bolszewikami-nie-walczyc-13.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]