Talk:Battles of Zhawar

Military history: Russian & Soviet C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

A fact from Battles of Zhawar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the units of the Red Army and the Afghan army fought the Battles of Zhawar in 1985-86 to destroy a mujahideen supply base near the Pakistani border?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/April.

Wikipedia

Good articles, but...

Raoulduke47:

The Zhawar article is another fine start by you in chronicling the battles of the 1980s war. However, I do believe that it suffers from an unnecessary anti-Soviet bias, largely because of the sources you are using. The works of Grau and Youssaf tend to be partisan in favor of the mujahideen. In the future I would like to introduce you to some other sources on Zhawar, and perhaps we can agree to some ammendments to the article.

Kenmore 07:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my primary source for writing this was an article based on mujahideen accounts of the battle, so it naturally leans towards their perspective. I think it is rather unfair to say Lester Grau is biased against the Soviets: he has also written books and articles in collaboration with Russian historians showing the Soviet view of this war. As for Youssaf, he is an officer of the ISI, and so he presents the Pakistani POV, that is not necessarily invalid. But by all means, introduce your sources!

Raoulduke47 20:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jalaluddin.jpg

Image:Jalaluddin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

статья стоит признать предвзята и написана с моджахедовских позиций и потери здесь основаны на данных моджахедах также как и информация про силы сторон и якобы имевшиеся танки на их стороне, хотя на самом деле здесь можно было использовать работы Лестера Грау в сотрудничестве с российскими историками, отражающие советский взгляд на эту войну или теже самые воспоминания генерала Ванникова и Громова которые имеют другой взгляд на те события Цйфыву (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the article should be recognized as biased and written from the mujahideen positions and the losses here are based on the data of the mujahideen as well as information about the forces of the parties and the supposedly available tanks on their side, although in fact it was possible to use the work of Lester Grau in collaboration with Russian historians, reflecting the Soviet a look at this war or the same memories of General Vannikov and Gromov who have a different view of those events Цйфыву (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Location?

I'm assuming this is the same Zhawar Kili located in Khost Province, not Paktia Province. I also noted that the Dawri Gar mountain near Zhawar is also located in Khost Province near the border with Pakistan. This needs to be revised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.221.133 (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]