Talk:Benjamin Boothby
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Perhaps a little more nuance and particularity - in part respect to Justice Boothby. THe man was neither a fool, nor uneducated in the law. So if he had a legal view, it had a basis, and if the remedy for the defects which he found was Imperial legislation changing the ground rules, then he was a man of principle and foresight. "confirming the authority of the colonial Parliament to pass legislation different from that passed by the Imperial Parliament" - the Colonial laws validity Act did no such thing - in fact it preserved the situation that clolonial laws were void where they were in conflict with Imperial legislation - a situation which was not to change until the enactment of the statute of Westminster.Suastiastu (talk) 10:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Stub-Class British Empire articles
- Low-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Adelaide articles
- Low-importance Adelaide articles
- WikiProject Adelaide articles
- Stub-Class Australian law articles
- Low-importance Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australia articles