Jump to content

Talk:Blackfish Publishing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggest merge

[edit]

In the AfD for this and the Death Ray (magazine) and Matt Bielby articles there was discussion regarding merging date from these article to this (Blackfish Publishing) article. I support this merge. The Bielby article has much unsourced information, and the Death Ray magazine) article isn't prohibitively long to merge. This would consolidate these highly-related articles into one article. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose The Bielby article is not completely sourced yet but I suspect things will crop up if we search hard enough - including the two CN tags I put in. However, Blackfish Publishing is hardly the only thing he's done. He's done notable work for Future Publishing, and indeed this is what a number of the reliable sources relate to. I think there is an equal argument for merging into this instead of Blackfish Publishing. Because I think the best article to merge with is ambiguous, I would suggest keeping it on its own is the best compromise. --Ritchie333 (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackfish Publishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackfish Publishing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]