Talk:Bob & Rose

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

'&' or 'and' - move to 'Bob & Rose'?[edit]

Most of the sources on the internet indicate that the title used an ampersand and not the word 'and'. Shouldn't this article therefore be at Bob & Rose not Bob and Rose? --GracieLizzie 13:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't have this one on DVD — can anybody check the titles for a definitive answer? If it's an ampersand in the titles then it should of course be moved, I agree. Angmering 15:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
It's definitely an ampersand in the title. Suzarella (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Based on a true story[edit]

I'm sure RTD said in his interview with Mark Lawson that Bob & Rose is based on a true story - an acquantance of RTD's (who works in broadcasting, IIRC, though he didn't name names) who fell in love and married a woman, despite being (until then!) gay. I thought this might be noteworthy, with a proper citation, in light of the "Controversy" section. David (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: and Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Minimac (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

In further detail, the copyrighted content was added here by LeighMichelle75, in which I've given her an only warning here. Minimac (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Episodes #3-6?[edit]

Any chance someone could supply synopsis for the rest of the episodes? (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)