Talk:Bobby Robinson (record producer)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bobby Robinson.jpg

Image:Bobby Robinson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

I've reverted edits by User:MorganCRobinson - who may be the subject of this article. The content of the edits may be true. However, they have not been verified. There may also be a conflict of interest, and the edits included promotional text which is not allowed under this guidance. If the editor concerned is indeed Mr. Robinson, I suggest that they read this helpful advice. I'm happy to assist in ensuring the article is both factually correct and within WP policy. See also WP:BLP. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Recording Company

Does anyone have any documentation that the 101-111 issues on "Fire Recording Company" with an address in Bakersfield, Calif. had anything to do with Bobby Robinson? Steve Pastor (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bobby Robinson (record producer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Robinson (record producer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110109183518/http://www.dnainfo.com/20110108/harlem/harlem-music-legend-dead to http://www.dnainfo.com/20110108/harlem/harlem-music-legend-dead

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Robinson

Oftentimes a rumor will spread like it's the gospel truth. It can get caught up in a political storm which if it doesn't get untangled it becomes etched in stone. Such is the case with Bobby Robinson's Happy House being declared the first Black-owned business on 125th Street.

What probably happened is that to save the building where Happy House was located the truth of it being one of the few Black-owned businesses in the 40's turned into it being the first Black-owned business on 125th Street.

But what does that do to the other Black-owned businesses that were before Robinson, like Morgan & Marvin Smith's Photography Studio next to the Apollo that opened in 1939?

So without discrediting Bobby Robinson I referenced a book that featured the Smith Brothers' photography studio, which would demonstrate at the least that there was one Black-owned business ahead of Bobby Robinson.

I don't want it to be confusing to the readers. So any suggestions on how I would convey that Robinson was not the first Black-owned business on 125th Street with the sources that are out there which simply indicate as such their place in time?

I'm looking for guidance on structuring the footnote so people understand what I'm doing or the purpose of the reference. Julius Tajiddin (talk) 03:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]