Talk:Bottlegate

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jacksonville (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jacksonville, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.JacksonvilleWikipedia:WikiProject JacksonvilleTemplate:WikiProject JacksonvilleJacksonville articles

Cleveland

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 13 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Simplexity22 (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2001 Jaguars-Browns officiating controversy → Bottlegate – Similar to the move discussion for Fail Mary, the current title of this article is a descriptive name, not the WP:COMMONNAME of the subject. Bottlegate is the most common name for the subject of this article and thus should be it's name. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support because it would avoid confusion by providing the WP:COMMONNAME. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 13:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support for same reason stated by EDG 543. --WuTang94 (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.