Talk:Boxer movement

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Page move from Yìhéquán to Boxers (group)

Hello. As you may have noticed, I have moved the page from Yìhéquán to Boxers (group). This falls in-line with the page-name policies laid out in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). In English, the term 'boxers' to refer to the group is nearly completely universal, never have I seen an example where the pinyin is used instead in a fully English publication. If you disagree or realize that I've made some major mistake, feel free to ping me on here or send me a message to me on my talk page.

Cheers! Khu'hamgaba Kitap^talk 22:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Members

Between 3 and 100000 members? Ripousse (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Characterization of xenophobia

@Simonm223 and @ProKMT, this seems like a conversation worth hashing out here. Cards on the table: I would personally very much characterize the Boxer movement as fundamentally xenophobic, though suffice it to say I'm not totally morally appalled about that, given the context.

While pointing to their slogan alone certainly doesn't suffice, I think a broad reading of expressed Boxer ideology and praxis bears this out. But I'm curious to hear what others think.Remsense 诉 23:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the removal of the anti-imperialism tag that bothers me. Simonm223 (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aye—if I understand correctly this echoes the old chestnut of "you wouldn't characterize the Seven Years' War as France falling victim to imperialism, so why do so with the Mughals or the Qing?" The Boxers can't be anti-imperialist because they were fierce proponents of an empire, in other words.

I don't find this argument persuasive, though I'm not sure I'm steelmanning it here, so I'm happy to be corrected. Remsense诉 23:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]