|WikiProject Books||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Scientology||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
|The Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing this page or associated pages.|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brain-Washing (book) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Brainwashing Manual Parallels in Modern Scientology
The bot removals seem to be general removal of any freeweb.com links. (It would be nice if the bots would reference any such list of blocked sites in their comments. Betacommand is shutoff for the moment after running wild.) AndroidCat 18:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Brainwashing2.JPG
Image:Brainwashing2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
- Added a fair use rationale template. Was this book ever copyrighted (1955)? The Church of Scientology could hardly copyright a book that they attributed to someone else, could they? AndroidCat (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Link removed for now. I've found something at http://www.xenu-directory.net/practices/brainwashing1.html that I presume is this book. Anyone with definitive knowledge of it feel free to re-add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)