Talk:Brief Candle in the Dark

"... continues his autobiography until present."[edit]

The sentence containing that phrase had already been false for a half year when contributed in November, as he's not dead yet, unless he lied. We'd best take him at his word: "I'll end where I began, on my seventieth birthday,...", per page 437 of the topic work.
--Jerzy•t 16:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Careless of me, make that read "over 4 years", and refer to the idea the sentence expresses, not the barely month-old sentence.
--Jerzy•t 17:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 September 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move, therefore, not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:57, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science → Brief Candle in the Dark – Per WP:SUBTITLE. (The proposed title already serves as a redirect.) 142.160.89.97 (talk) 00:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hhkohh (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Seems a common name Hhkohh (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hhkohh: How do you reconcile your position with our book-specific guideline, WP:SUBTITLE, which states:

Usually, a Wikipedia article on a book (or other medium, such as a movie, TV special or video game) does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name, per WP:CONCISE. The only exception to that is short article titles, for disambiguation purposes.

142.160.89.97 (talk) 01:03, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SUBTITLE is not a policy, just a guideline, see also WP:COMMONNAME and other related policy Hhkohh (talk) 09:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I see no issue with the requested move, and it abides by the given guideline. -- Alex^TW 03:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no, better with the full title. More helpful, clearer. And more in line with review references to a recent book. In ictu oculi (talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - guideline cited was based on a flawed assumption. Books and other media items are usually referred to the first time by the full long name and then for brevity, just continue using the short version. --Gonnym (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.