Talk:Brindabella Range

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Mountains (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Australia / Canberra  (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconBrindabella Range is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to for other than editorial assistance.

Merger of Brindabella National Park[edit]

A merger of Brindabella National Park into this article proposed as it is a very minimal stub and perhaps the content would be better developed as a section within this Brindabella Ranges article.--A Y Arktos 11:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

There is quite an active wikiproject on protected areas of the world. They would probably not be happy with the national park being made a sub-section. --Martyman-(talk) 23:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Protected areas, User Diceman made the following comment:

    :A National Park is a fairly specific area and is treated differently from the surrounding terrain (whether that's in theory or practice I'm not sure). I think the information on the Brindabella Ranges specific to the national park should be included on the national park page, and any relevant information about the park mentioned on the ranges page. I can see why you might want to combine the articles, but in the case of protected areas it wouldn't be right to eliminate an article entirely, consider it a kind of database. - Diceman 15:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Accordingly I have removed the merger tags.--A Y Arktos 21:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brindabella Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)