This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Reviewer states "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." This is just plain wrong! Perhaps reviewer was looking at an earlier draft which had sources Wikipedia considers unreliable. I removed all such sources from the version reviewer claims to have reviewed. The article cites only reliable sources. Please retracy declination. Thank you. Sylvan1971 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sources need to meet, in general, five prongs to be considered reliable:
The lot of your sources fail the first prong, being nothing but passing mentions in credits, profiles, or interviews. You have nothing that actually talks about the subject or their work, and that is where you are stumbling. Just because the outlet is usable doesn't mean we blindly accept everything that outlet puts out as a source. Context matters.
This situation is very common with respect to "backstage" personnel working in any aspect of the entertainment industries as they get none of the credit or blame, excepting particularly egregious examples, for their work - it all goes to either the stars or the showrunner/producers/director/writer. This in turn means it's next to impossible to have an article on them simply because the sources we're looking for do not exist. —Jéské Courianov^_^va little blue Bori23:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{subst:requested move|Bruce Ryan ([production designer)|I have been working on this draft article for almost two years and have responded to every editor's helpful comment by making appropriate changes. The comments have stopped coming, the subject has recently received a new award nomination and I feel this article is ready for mainspace. I moved it myself but this was undone by an editor. I should add that the talk page includes an unsigned accusation that this article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments. This is completely false. I have never received payment for an edit and have no COI with respect to this article. Thank you.}} Sylvan1971 (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
