Talk:Bumper Stumpers

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bumper Stumpers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Game shows Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Bumper Stumpers returns to GameTV[edit]

But Bumper Stumpers will return to GameTV on Feb 3.

and here's the source:

https://www.igametv.com/shows/1278/

and fail to see how it's unsourced Digifan23 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is unsourced, and the link in this edit posted February 3 did not originally include scheduling details for February 4. WP:BURDEN of proof is for editors to include sources when adding info. Stop making unsourced edits and they'll stop being reverted for being unsourced. AldezD (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it perhaps the nomenclature being used for that reference that is at issue? It appears the edit being made is in document reruns are starting back up and the editor is using an online TV guide as evidence of this fact. While it's debatable if this edit even should be included, can we agree that the reference does support reruns are starting again on certain networks airuditious (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This link is a dynamic target and will change based upon the day it is accessed. It does not meet WP:V. A source that meets guidelines needs to be included with the edit adding information. AldezD (talk) 03:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Dynamic link" is all that was need to clarify this issue. As such, completely agreed - this does not qualify as a RS. airuditious (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]