Talk:Canterbury city walls
Appearance
Canterbury city walls has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 24, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Canterbury city walls/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 20:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll be conducting this review. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Images fine (one tweaked by me). Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 16:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've made one tweak to the prose, but there isn't much left to comment on. I rectified a few things with the layout a couple of weeks ago, so the structure's now fine. The citations are all perfect (and certainly GA standard) in form and number. No edit wars or neutrality problems (given the subject matter, neither was particularly likely). Accordingly I am passing the article. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Kent-related articles
- Low-importance Kent-related articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Medieval warfare articles
- Medieval warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles