Jump to content

Talk:Carbon finance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Environmental technology template

I'd like to replace the Environmental technology template with one that matches the standard navbox style, i.e. horizontal instead of vertical, collapsing and typically placed at the bottom of article pages. I've done a mock up of what this would look like at {{User:Jwanders/ET}}. Figured this was a big enough change that I should post before going ahead with it. Please discuss here--jwandersTalk 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carbon finance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into climate finance?

[edit]

Can this article be merged into climate finance or does it need to remain as a stand-alone article? Pinging User:Richarit, User:Chidgk1. EMsmile (talk) 17:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or should it rather be merged into carbon price? Pinging also User:Dtetta EMsmile (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think merging it to either of those articles would be fine. It certainly doesn’t seem to merit its own article. Dtetta (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The article looks quite out of date and it only really mentions offsetting, not other carbon/mitigation finance.
We can merge it into climate finance (which I am working on at the moment). Offsetting is one of the financial models mentioned already there but it is using an excerpt from Carbon offsets and credits . So maybe we could also incorporate directly into the carbon offsets article ?
Is there anything worth keeping from the article that is not already covered in the other articles? Richarit (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The World Bank historical estimates should be merged into Carbon emission trading#History. Information about the Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation should probably be there too, but the text here is unsourced (there is some sourced text at Kyoto Protocol. The World Bank section here could be moved directly to Climate finance#Multilateral climate funds, which already has a World Bank paragraph. CMD (talk) 09:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Chipmunkdavis. Do you agree that the article should be merged out of existence, and if yes, where should the term "carbon finance" in the end be redirected to? EMsmile (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The mergers I mention would cover all sources content, and I'd redirect this to Climate finance as roughly synonymous. CMD (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have moved the WB section now to climate finance. I put it in Climate finance#Multilateral development banks, rather than Climate finance#Multilateral climate funds MCF because this is how it is categorised according to climate funds update (the source I used) and when the financial flows are tracked. There were some sources for the CDM and JI that have left in. Richarit (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have copied over the carbon market data. That is as far as I see the merge done. CMD (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

OK, so I have replaced the remaining text with a redirect to climate finance because the remaining text was not usable anywhere else. Thanks for the collaboration. EMsmile (talk) 12:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]