Jump to content

Talk:Carlos Saavedra Gutiérrez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of article

[edit]

All edits to the article have been made in order to accurately present the profile of the former Secretary of Labor of Puerto Rico. Please, if anyone believes the content—as is—seems editorialized or biased; please advise as to what changes would correct that. The edits are not meant to be editorialized but have been made in order to further the scope of the article. Each edition that has been deemed as vandalism and deleted by an unknown user is grounded on neutral newspaper articles that summarize controversies or issues in which the former Secretary was involved. Moreover, some information that could be deemed as biased in the way it has been drafted—as it mentions accolades that are not supported by any source—have not been deleted in order to allow the article to be fairly balanced. Political figures have lights and shadows that have to be included in order to provide the reader a balanced portrait of the person being covered. Rickyfortuno (talk)

As per wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons, Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately.

Recent edits highlight negatives while removing positive aspects. This creates an unbalanced article. For example, edits by user RickyFortuno highlight criticism by labor unions, but remove sourced materials concerning job growth and unemployment rate. Also, the edits include opinions like "controversial tenure", "shamefully resigning" and "political activism" in law school which appear to be personal opinions and are unsourced.

I edited unsourced or poorly sourced material, removed personal editorializing comments, while maintined viewpoint of labor union criticism - which is correctly sourced - in order to balance articlle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AviendhaGarret (talkcontribs) 00:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]