Jump to content

Talk:Cassius Khan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

This article has too much opinion 'which is phenomenal'etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.179.169 (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It really is too bad that somebody( I have the IP address) is trying to adulterate this article. At least show yourself.

It is too bad. Maybe you should show the IP address of that person, since they are in the same area.Some people are jealous of this kind and humble maestro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talkcontribs) 15:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC) The IP address of that person who I will not name is 209.53.214.179.[reply]

Once again the name of the person is Junior Thirakwa, here is his IP 142.179.211.28, he wrote a lot of bad things, but we will press charges, as an investigation is under way. he also visits another site called www.tabla.com in the forums, we will find him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talkcontribs) 18:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THE PAGE ADULTERER OF CASSIUS KHAN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AARON GERSHFIELD

www.aarongershfieldnewyork.com/ wiki/wiki.php?wiki=Cassius_Khan - 17k - Cached - Similar pages

IF YOU CLICK ON THAT LINK, YOU WILL FIND THE ADULTERATED ARTICLE ON THE PAGE, THIS GUY IS SICK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talkcontribs) 15:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not... /quite/ Wikified

[edit]

Hi chaps, just dropping by randomly. I thought I had to add the 'needs wikified' tab to the article because, frankly, it does. I'm not saying that any of the information on this page is false, I'm entirely willing to believe it to be true, but articles in an encyclopedia aren't supposed to sound quite as explicitly hagiographic as this article does. Some citations here and there might help, but ultimately a fresh start with a less devotional emphasis might be in order. Also I'm pretty sure 'outing' editors is not standard er... 'wikilove': if you have problems with an editor you can deal with them through official channels. DuncanCrowe (talk)

This article is an embarrassment to this encyclopedia. Wording like "bringing honour and prestige to his country" and "immense skill" is a ridiculous ego puff piece obviously written by this person himself which is extremely frowned upon. If this article had any references that would be helpful otherwise in one week I'm nominating it for deletion. Mkdwtalk 21:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cassius Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]