This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
@Gusfriend: I may be wrong since I'm very new to the AfC review process, but my initial thought when looking at this was that she might meet WP:SCHOLAR and thus if this draft was moved to mainspace could survive an AfD nomination? She's had honours and appears to be cited numerous times. But I have very limited experience with understanding how notability for scholars works, apart from knowing that the SNG exists, so I could definitely be wrong. Clovermoss(talk) 14:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article definitely passes WP:SCOLARWP:SCHOLAR based on their being a fellow of AIMBE, etc. although I would change the external links to in line references instead. I actually wondered why I hadn't accepted it initially until I looked at the previous version and saw that none of the fellowship information was in the version that I declined. Gusfriend (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 22:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi kj cheetham. I noticed you're an NPP reviewer so I wanted your thoughts on something. Thanks for changing external links to inline citations, by the way. I removed the more sources tag since there actually are citations verifying most of the content, even if there's more of a focus on primary ones, but I was wondering if you agree with my course of action here? I just wanted to make sure I'm not missing something obvious. Clovermoss(talk) 15:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Clovermoss. You seem to be on the right lines! The fellowship sources could potentially have better links, so I've just changed one of them at least. But overall you're right that there's too much of a focus primary sources, so I've just tagged for article for that. As noted above, they are definitely notable though under WP:NACADEMIC clause 3. Hope that helps! -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}