This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Elaborating on credentials, even if that person's assertions are dismissed by the medical community (which is called "orthodox"), reeks like POV pushing. Further, deleting large parts of the articel without discussions looks a bit unreasonable.Nomen Nescio 11:14, 8 May
2006 (UTC)
^^ You should acquaint yourself with the fallacy of "appeal to authority"; you are the one pushing POV by assuming that the authoritative view is the correct one (Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, and many other scientists would disagree). The mainstream scientific view is widely publicized. The views and credentials of the dissenters are not. Not telling both sides of the story is committing another fallacy called "special pleading". I am not explaining future reversions, since you people are clearly acting in bad faith...[AT] 19 May, 2006
.jpg){kind=small}
Nomen Nescio 11:14, 8 May
2006 (UTC)