Talk:Chaamp

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 9 July 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved — JFG ^talk 10:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Champ (2017 film) → Chaamp – A recent source used in the article, and the movie poster shown at the article, both confirm that the title of this film is "Chaamp" (with two A's), not "Champ". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Chaamp, leaving Champ (2017 film) as a redirect to it. IMDb also says Chaamp. You can guarantee that people are going to misspell the title, so leaving the redirect will make the article easier to find. Narky Blert (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reception[edit]

It Generally Get Positive Review From Critics. The Performance Of Dev Was Highly Praised. ASHIKUL ALAM (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]